02220nas a2200385   4500008004100000245012300041210006900164260000800233300001500241490000700256520091800263653001101181653001901192653001501211653002001226653001901246653001201265653001001277653001801287653001701305653001501322653001101337653002801348653001001376653001901386653002501405653002701430653001501457100002001472700002201492700002101514700002201535700001701557856026001574       2011                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Lamium L. (Lamiaceae): Disentangling origins of presumed allotetraploids0 aMolecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Lamium L Lamiaceae  cJan  a986–10000 v603 aThis is the first comprehensive molecular investigation of the genus Lamium L. We have addressed phylogenetic relationships and presumed allopolyploid speciation by use of nuclear (NRPA2, 5S-NTS) and chloroplast (matK, psbA-trnH, rps16, trnL, trnL-F, trnS-G) DNA sequence data. Nuclear and chloroplast data were incongruent, and nuclear data showed better correlation with morphology. Bayesian and parsimony phylogenetic results show that (I) Lamium galeobdolon is sister to all remaining Lamium species; (2) Wiedemannia is nested within Lamium; (3) L. amplexicaule is polyphyletic; (4) most tetraploids are of hybrid origin; (5) L. amplexicaule var. orientale is allotetraploid; and (6) Mennema's (1989) infrageneric classification is not corroborated by molecular data. Based on the molecular results, and taking morphology into account, we suggest resurrection of two species: L. aleppicum and L. paczoskianum.10a5S-Nts10aAllopolyploidy10aAsteraceae10aChloroplast Dna10aClassification10aComplex10aCpdna10aDna-Sequences10aIncongruence10aLamioideae10aLamium10aMolecular Phylogenetics10aNrpa210aReconstruction10aReticulate Evolution10aSilene Caryophyllaceae10aSpeciation1 aBendiksby, Mika1 aBrysting, Anne, K1 aThorbek, Lisbeth1 aGussarova, Galina1 aRyding, Olof  uhttp://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=2B%2540kNem2NICHnHfl3PI&product=WOS&UT=000294507000004&SrcApp=Papers&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_images%252Fwok5_failed_auth.html&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&SrcAuth=meken04212nas a2200337   4500008004100000245011100041210006900152260000800221300001400229490000700243520296400250653002003214653002603234653003203260653002403292653001403316653001403330653002503344653002703369653002403396653001803420653002603438653002303464653002103487653001303508653002603521100002603547700002103573700002003594856026003614       2010                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae) - Taxonomy, biogeography and conflicts0 aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae Lamiaceae Nepetoideae Mentheae   cJan  a501–5230 v553 aAlthough the subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) is considered to be monophyletic, relationships between tribes, subtribes and genera within the subfamily are poorly understood as complex and possibly homoplasious morphological characters make taxa difficult to delimit. DNA sequence data from three regions (chloroplast: trnK intron; trnL-F; nuclear: ITS) in total including 278 accessions, representing 38 out of 40 genera of subtribe Menthinae and 11 outgroup genera, were used to reconstruct the evolutionary history, test previous hypotheses of classification, explain biogeographic patterns and elucidate character evolution. Using maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analysis phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data were incongruent, consequently the data were analyzed separately.Both nuclear and chloroplast datasets provide strong support for three major lineages: the "Satureja", "Micromeria" and "Clinopodium" group. The first contains members of Satureja and Gontscharovia. In the second lineage Micromeria s.str. and Origanum were resolved as monophyletic, Pentapleura and Zataria indicated as sister groups. Thymbra includes two species of Satureja turning the latter genus polyphyletic. Thymus is revealed as paraphyletic with respect to Argantoniella and Saccocalyx in both and Origanum in the plastid dataset only. In the third lineage, the Clinopodium-group, branching pattern is highly incongruent among datasets and possibly influenced by recent and ancient hybridization, chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting. However, identical terminal groups are inferred in both analyses. A Madagascan lineage of "Micromeria", sister to the recently described South African Killickia, is suggested to represent a new genus. The Himalayan Clinopodium nepalense group and the tropical African C. abyssinicum alliance are monophyletic but indicated in different positions. Both groups appear in the ITS phylogeny in a clade with Cyclotrichium and Mentha, relationships not suggested previously. The enigmatic Micromeria cymuligera is close to Mentha and possibly is a representative of this genus. Species of Acinos, now regarded as part of Clinopodium, are mixed up with species of Ziziphora, questioning either the inclusion of Acinos in Clinopodium or generic distinctness of Ziziphora. All data sets suggest a monophyly of the New World taxa and argue for long distance dispersal from the Old World, rather than a vicariance explanation. Bystropogon marks the split up between the two lineages. Inclusion of 22 genera intermixed with Clinopodium spp. in the New World clade provides evidence that the current circumscription of the genus is highly unnatural. Low sequence divergence resulting in low phylogenetic resolution especially at the base of the clade indicate a rapid radiation accompanied by considerable ecological diversification and speciation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.10aChloroplast Dna10aGeneric delimitations10aGenus Bystropogon Lamiaceae10aIsland Colonization10aLamiaceae10aMenthinae10aMicromeria Lamiaceae10aMinthostachys Labiatae10aMolecular phylogeny10aNorth-America10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aParsimony Analysis10aSalvia Lamiaceae10aSatureja10aScrub Mints Lamiaceae1 aBraeuchler, Christian1 aMeimberg, Harald1 aHeubl, Guenther  uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4YC2XFX-1&_user=2139813&_coverDate=05%252F31%252F2010&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000054276&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2139813&md5=d02797nas a2200361   4500008004100000245013300041210006900174260000800243300001600251490000700267520153700274653001701811653002001828653001701848653001501865653002001880653001201900653001501912653003201927653001301959653002101972653000901993653001002002653001402012653001402026100002202040700001902062700002902081700002002110700002302130700002202153856026002175       2007                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny, biogeography, and systematics of Dicerandra (Lamiaceae), a genus endemic to the southeastern United States'0 aMolecular phylogeny biogeography and systematics of Dicerandra L  cJan  a1017–10270 v943 aDicerandra, an endemic mint of the southeastern United States, comprises nine species, all of which are threatened or endangered and restricted to sandhill vegetation and a mosaic of scrub habitats. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Dicerandra based on data from the nuclear and plastid genomes for all 13 taxa of the genus, identified two strongly supported clades, corresponding to the four annual and to the five perennial species of Dicerandra. However, the nuclear and plastid trees were incongruent in their placement of two perennial taxa, D. cornutissima and D. immaculata var. savannarum, perhaps due to ancient hybridization or to lineage sorting. Based on these analyses, the widespread D. linearifolia is not monophyletic, with populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia falling into either western or eastern clades. The western clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia and var. robustior, occurs in an area drained by rivers flowing toward the Gulf of Mexico, whereas the eastern clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia, D. densiflora, D. odoratissima, and D. radfordiana (i.e., all the annual species), occupies a region drained by rivers flowing to the Atlantic Ocean. Although this pattern of genetic differentiation between populations from these two river drainages has been documented in several animal species, it has not previously been reported for plants. A revised subgeneric classification is presented to reflect the annual and perennial clades.10aBiogeography10aChloroplast Dna10aConservation10aDicerandra10aEndemic Species10aFlorida10aInferences10aInternal Transcribed Spacer10aLabiatae10aLake Wales Ridge10aMatk10aPlant10aSequences10aTrnt-Trnl1 aOliveira, Luiz, O1 aHuck, Robin, B1 aGitzendanner, Matthew, A1 aJudd, Walter, S1 aSoltis, Douglas, E1 aSoltis, Pamela, S  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000249830600013&SID=2ABa3P2LDb%2540FhI56hhg&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_i03006nas a2200277   4500008004100000245014900041210006900190260000800259300001400267490000700281520191100288653002702199653002002226653001702246653002702263653002302290653002202313653002202335653002602357653002502383653001402408100001602422700001502438700001502453856026002468       2006                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA: Evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia?0 aMolecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints Lamiaceae  cJan  a193–2070 v313 aConradina (Lamiaceae) consists of six allopatric species endemic to the southeastern United States, four of which are federally endangered or threatened. The limits and status of several taxa have been contested based on morphological grounds, and clarification of these limits is necessary for the design and implementation of effective and fiscally responsible protection and management plans. The objectives of this study were to investigate the monophyly of Conradina and its relationship to other endemic mints of the southeastern United States, to understand the patterns of diversification in Conradina, and to clarify species relationships. A molecular phylogeny was inferred by sequencing ITS and plastid regions from multiple accessions of each species of Conradina (except for a single accession of C. verticillata) and multiple individuals from species of Clinopodium, Dicerandra, Piloblephis, Stachydeoma, Monarda, Pycnanthemum, and Mentha. ITS sequence data strongly support the monophyly of Conradina, in agreement with evidence from morphology. In contrast, plastid sequence data do not support a monophyletic Conradina and place the genus as paraphyletic to Clinopodium, Stachydeoma, and Piloblephis. Similar plastid haplotypes are shared by different genera, perhaps due to shared ancestral polymorphisms, or more likely, introgression that occurred recently or during the Pleistocene. Within Conradina, ITS sequence data do not resolve species relationships, while plastid sequence data do not support the monophyly of most traditionally defined species of Conradina that are distinguishable morphologically. Species relationships in the plastid data set may also be obscured by introgression or ancestral polymorphism. More rapidly evolving sequence data from nuclear markers will be necessary to clarify relationships in Conradina and related mints from the southeastern United States.10aArmeria Plumbaginaceae10aChloroplast Dna10aIncongruence10aLength Difference Test10aMaximum-Likelihood10aMitochondrial-Dna10aNoncoding Regions10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aReticulate Evolution10aSequences1 aEdwards, CE1 aSoltis, DE1 aSoltis, PS  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000236119500018&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image02786nas a2200301   4500008004100000245016200041210006900203260000800272300001400280490000700294520158600301653001901887653002001906653002601926653003201952653002601984653002302010653003102033653003102064653001802095653001902113100001502132700001702147700001502164700002102179700002402200856026002224       2004                        eng d00aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian genus Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) to the New World: A case of conflicting phylogenies0 aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the M  cJan  a702–7150 v293 aBystropogon (Lamiaceae) is endemic to the Macaronesian Islands and represents the best-known example of a putative phytogeographic connection between these islands and the New World. Previous morphological taxonomic studies suggested that this genus is closely related to the western South American Minthostachys. Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S subunit of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL gene and trnL-trnF spacer of the chloroplast genome for 33 of the 72 genera in the Mentheae tribe were performed. Maximum parsimony analysis of the combined data set resulted in 63 most parsimonious trees. The strict consensus tree of this analysis shows with moderate bootstrap support (74%) that Bystropogon is sister to the Old World taxa Acinos, Ziziphora, and Clinopodium vulgare. When analyzed separately, the ITS and trnL/F data sets do not agree as to the sister group to Bystropogon, although none supports a sister relationship with Minthostachys. The cpDNA phylogeny strongly supports a relationship of Bystropogon with a clade of New World mint taxa (90% bootstrap value). Due to the apparent conflict between the chloroplast and nuclear characters observed in the phylogenies, we are not certain of the true biogeographic relationship of Bystropogon. Finally, in all analyses, all of the Mentheae genera sampled in this study form a monophyletic group (100% bootstrap value) and a derived clade of ten New World genera is found. These results contribute to our understanding of generic relationships within the tribe.10aCanary-Islands10aChloroplast Dna10aIlex L. Aquifoliaceae10aInternal Transcribed Spacer10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aParsimony Analysis10aPollen Wall Ultrastructure10aRestriction-Site Variation10aSequence Data10aSubgenus Pinus1 aTrusty, JL1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aBogler, DJ1 aSantos-Guerra, A1 aFrancisco-Ortega, J  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000223702400014&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image02334nas a2200397   4500008004100000245010800041210006900149260000800218300001400226490000700240520114900247653002401396653002001420653001901440653002301459653002701482653001401509653001501523653002801538653001501566653002301581653001401604653002101618653001701639653001801656653003501674653002801709653001601737100002601753700002001779700001701799700002301816700002201839700002501861856005001886       2010                        eng d00aMOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS, CHARACTER EVOLUTION, AND SUPRAGENERIC CLASSIFICATION OF LAMIOIDEAE (LAMIACEAE)0 aMOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS CHARACTER EVOLUTION AND SUPRAGENERIC CLA  cJan  a191–2170 v973 aThis paper presents a phylogenetic analysis of Lamiaceae subfam. Lamioideae (including subfamily Pogostemonoideae) based on sequences of the trnL intron, trnL-trnF intergenic spacer, and rps16 intron of the plastid genuine. It is the first analysis that includes all major lamioid and pogostemonoid genera. Monophyly of Lamioideae s.l. (i.e., including Pogostemonoideae) is strongly supported, with Cymaria Benth. as its sister group, and Pogostemonoideae, which sometimes has been recognized as a subfamily, is subsumed in Lamioideae. On the basis of the phylogenetic hypothesis, Lamioideae is divided into nine tribes. Three new tribes are established: Gomphostemmateae Seheen {&} Lindqvist, Phlomideae Mathiesen, and Leucadeae Scheen {&} Ryding. The other six tribes are: Pogostemoneae Briq., Synandreae Raf., Staehydeae Dumort., Leonureae Dumort., Limieae Coss. {&} Germ., and Marrubieae Vis. The genus Betonica L. is reestablished. The results also strongly suggest that the genera Stachys L., Sideritis L., Ballota and Leucas R. Br. are polyphyletic or paraphyletic. The results were used to examine evolution of non-molecular characters.10aCharacter Evolution10aChloroplast Dna10aClassification10aEremostachys Bunge10aHawaiian Endemic Mints10aLamiaceae10aLamioideae10aMolecular Phylogeneties10aMorphology10aPericarp Structure10aPhlomis L10aPogostemonoideae10aRps16 Intron10aSequence Data10aSubtribe Melittidinae Labiatae10aSystematic Implications10aVerbenaceae1 aScheen, Anne-Cathrine1 aBendiksby, Mika1 aRyding, Olof1 aMathiesen, Cecilie1 aAlbert, Victor, A1 aLindqvist, Charlotte  uhttp://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/200717401999nas a2200277   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260000800182300001400190490000700204520104600211653001801257653001701275653002001292653001401312653001301326653001001339653001401349653001201363653001001375653001401385653001401399100002601413700002201439856026001461       2009                        eng d00aMolecular Phylogenetics of the Leucas Group (Lamioideae; Lamiaceae)0 aMolecular Phylogenetics of the Leucas Group Lamioideae Lamiaceae  cJan  a173–1810 v343 aThe genus Leucas R.Br. includes 100 recognized species ranging in distribution from Africa through the Indian subcontinent to Queensland, Australia. Morphological cladistic studies have suggested that several other genera of Lamioideae - Acrotome, Isoleucas, Leonotis, and Otostegia (pro parte) - may be closely related to Leucas, or even nested within it. Here we use phylogenetic analysis of three plastid DNA loci, the trnL-F region, trnS-G spacer, and the rps16 intron and reach similar conclusions. Many of the morphological features used to maintain Leucas since 1810 are shared ancestral (symplesiomorphic) characters. The other genera (or subgeneric group in the case of Otostegia) are therefore defined by apomorphic states. This is particularly apparent in the case of Leonotis, with its highly specialized bird-pollinated flowers, derived within a paraphyletic and insect-pollinated Leucas. Some geographically isolated groups are monophyletic, including all Asian species of Leucas, a Socotran clade, and a large African lineage.10aAmplification10aBiogeography10aChloroplast Dna10aEvolution10aLabiatae10aMints10aParsimony10aRegions10aRps1610aTrnl-Trnf10aTrns-Trng1 aScheen, Anne-Cathrine1 aAlbert, Victor, A  uhttp://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=2B%2540kNem2NICHnHfl3PI&product=WOS&UT=000263801200018&SrcApp=Papers&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_images%252Fwok5_failed_auth.html&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&SrcAuth=meken