01640nas a2200133   4500008004100000245006700041210006500108260000800173300001400181490000800195520118600203100001401389856010301403       2010                        eng d00aPericarp structure and phylogeny of tribe Mentheae (Lamiaceae)0 aPericarp structure and phylogeny of tribe Mentheae Lamiaceae  cMar  a165–1750 v2853 aPericarp structure is investigated in 143 speci- mens belonging to 59 out of ca. 65 genera and 134 out of ca. 2,000 species of Lamiaceae subfamily Nepetoideae tribe Mentheae. Some of the data presented by earlier authors are believed to be incorrect. The variation in pericarp structure has been found to be strongly correlated to the variations in DNA and gross morphological characters. The groups of two-sta- minate genera (Salvia, etc.) and four-staminate genera of Salviinae (Lepechinia and Chaunostoma) can be distin- guished from each other and from other labiates by differences in pericarp structure. The other two subtribes, Menthinae and Nepetinae, differ considerably, but their variations strongly overlap. The differences in pericarp structure also suggest that Menthinae can be divided into three main monophyletic groups based on other data: (1) the main bulk of the tribe, (2) a group of Prunella and Cleonia and perhaps also Horminum, and (3) the characteristic genus Lycopus. Pericarp data dis- agree with a suggestion that the genus Melissa should be included in the subtribe Salviinae. Modifications of the sub- tribal classification of Mentheae are discussed.1 aRyding, O  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/pericarp-structure-and-phylogeny-tribe-mentheae-lamiaceae02286nas a2200325   4500008004100000245010200041210006900143260000800212300001600220490000700236520131300243653001201556653000801568653001401576653001401590653001301604653001401617653001301631653002001644653001501664653002601679653001401705653002101719653001801740653001601758100002101774700001601795700001901811856013001830       2010                        eng d00aPhylogeny of tribe Mentheae (Lamiaceae): The story of molecules and micromorphological characters0 aPhylogeny of tribe Mentheae Lamiaceae The story of molecules and  cJan  a1065–10760 v593 aMentheae are the largest tribe in the family Lamiaceae and economically important, including herbs like mint, sage and thyme. The evolutionary history of this tribe was reconstructed based on ITS and trnL-trnF spacer sequence data of 71 species, representing. 47 out of 65 genera. The resulting phylogeny was used to analyse the distribution of selected morphological characteristics such as sexine ornamentation of pollen, nutlet shape with existence of abscission scar and its form, and trichome types. Two monophyletic groups are recognized, which largely correspond to the current subtribal circumscription. Subtribe Salviinae is monophyletic, including the genus Melissa which was a genus of uncertain affinity in Mentheae. Subtribe Menthinae is not monophyletic since Cleonia, Horminum, Hyssopus, Lycopus and Prunella are more closely related with subtribe Nepetinae. Although we could not detect any morphological synapomorphies for each clade, morphological variation seems to be correlated with the molecular phylogeny. A circular abscission scar without distinct lateral areole occurred mainly in Salviinae, while the majority of the species of Mentheae and Nepetinae had a clear areole at the abscission scar. In addition, a reticulate sexine ornamentation is rather common in the Menthinae clade.10aAnatomy10aDna10aEvolution10aInference10aLabiatae10aLamiaceae10aMentheae10aMicromorphology10aMorphology10aNepetoideae Lamiaceae10aPhylogeny10aSalvia Lamiaceae10aSequence Data10aVerbenaceae1 aMoon, Hye-Kyoung1 aSmets, Erik1 aHuysmans, Suzy  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/phylogeny-tribe-mentheae-lamiaceae-story-molecules-and-micromorphological-characters04212nas a2200337   4500008004100000245011100041210006900152260000800221300001400229490000700243520296400250653002003214653002603234653003203260653002403292653001403316653001403330653002503344653002703369653002403396653001803420653002603438653002303464653002103487653001303508653002603521100002603547700002103573700002003594856026003614       2010                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae) - Taxonomy, biogeography and conflicts0 aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae Lamiaceae Nepetoideae Mentheae   cJan  a501–5230 v553 aAlthough the subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) is considered to be monophyletic, relationships between tribes, subtribes and genera within the subfamily are poorly understood as complex and possibly homoplasious morphological characters make taxa difficult to delimit. DNA sequence data from three regions (chloroplast: trnK intron; trnL-F; nuclear: ITS) in total including 278 accessions, representing 38 out of 40 genera of subtribe Menthinae and 11 outgroup genera, were used to reconstruct the evolutionary history, test previous hypotheses of classification, explain biogeographic patterns and elucidate character evolution. Using maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analysis phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data were incongruent, consequently the data were analyzed separately.Both nuclear and chloroplast datasets provide strong support for three major lineages: the "Satureja", "Micromeria" and "Clinopodium" group. The first contains members of Satureja and Gontscharovia. In the second lineage Micromeria s.str. and Origanum were resolved as monophyletic, Pentapleura and Zataria indicated as sister groups. Thymbra includes two species of Satureja turning the latter genus polyphyletic. Thymus is revealed as paraphyletic with respect to Argantoniella and Saccocalyx in both and Origanum in the plastid dataset only. In the third lineage, the Clinopodium-group, branching pattern is highly incongruent among datasets and possibly influenced by recent and ancient hybridization, chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting. However, identical terminal groups are inferred in both analyses. A Madagascan lineage of "Micromeria", sister to the recently described South African Killickia, is suggested to represent a new genus. The Himalayan Clinopodium nepalense group and the tropical African C. abyssinicum alliance are monophyletic but indicated in different positions. Both groups appear in the ITS phylogeny in a clade with Cyclotrichium and Mentha, relationships not suggested previously. The enigmatic Micromeria cymuligera is close to Mentha and possibly is a representative of this genus. Species of Acinos, now regarded as part of Clinopodium, are mixed up with species of Ziziphora, questioning either the inclusion of Acinos in Clinopodium or generic distinctness of Ziziphora. All data sets suggest a monophyly of the New World taxa and argue for long distance dispersal from the Old World, rather than a vicariance explanation. Bystropogon marks the split up between the two lineages. Inclusion of 22 genera intermixed with Clinopodium spp. in the New World clade provides evidence that the current circumscription of the genus is highly unnatural. Low sequence divergence resulting in low phylogenetic resolution especially at the base of the clade indicate a rapid radiation accompanied by considerable ecological diversification and speciation. (C) 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.10aChloroplast Dna10aGeneric delimitations10aGenus Bystropogon Lamiaceae10aIsland Colonization10aLamiaceae10aMenthinae10aMicromeria Lamiaceae10aMinthostachys Labiatae10aMolecular phylogeny10aNorth-America10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aParsimony Analysis10aSalvia Lamiaceae10aSatureja10aScrub Mints Lamiaceae1 aBraeuchler, Christian1 aMeimberg, Harald1 aHeubl, Guenther  uhttp://www.sciencedirect.com/science?_ob=ArticleURL&_udi=B6WNH-4YC2XFX-1&_user=2139813&_coverDate=05%252F31%252F2010&_rdoc=1&_fmt=high&_orig=gateway&_origin=gateway&_sort=d&_docanchor=&view=c&_acct=C000054276&_version=1&_urlVersion=0&_userid=2139813&md5=d02334nas a2200397   4500008004100000245010800041210006900149260000800218300001400226490000700240520114900247653002401396653002001420653001901440653002301459653002701482653001401509653001501523653002801538653001501566653002301581653001401604653002101618653001701639653001801656653003501674653002801709653001601737100002601753700002001779700001701799700002301816700002201839700002501861856005001886       2010                        eng d00aMOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS, CHARACTER EVOLUTION, AND SUPRAGENERIC CLASSIFICATION OF LAMIOIDEAE (LAMIACEAE)0 aMOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS CHARACTER EVOLUTION AND SUPRAGENERIC CLA  cJan  a191–2170 v973 aThis paper presents a phylogenetic analysis of Lamiaceae subfam. Lamioideae (including subfamily Pogostemonoideae) based on sequences of the trnL intron, trnL-trnF intergenic spacer, and rps16 intron of the plastid genuine. It is the first analysis that includes all major lamioid and pogostemonoid genera. Monophyly of Lamioideae s.l. (i.e., including Pogostemonoideae) is strongly supported, with Cymaria Benth. as its sister group, and Pogostemonoideae, which sometimes has been recognized as a subfamily, is subsumed in Lamioideae. On the basis of the phylogenetic hypothesis, Lamioideae is divided into nine tribes. Three new tribes are established: Gomphostemmateae Seheen {&} Lindqvist, Phlomideae Mathiesen, and Leucadeae Scheen {&} Ryding. The other six tribes are: Pogostemoneae Briq., Synandreae Raf., Staehydeae Dumort., Leonureae Dumort., Limieae Coss. {&} Germ., and Marrubieae Vis. The genus Betonica L. is reestablished. The results also strongly suggest that the genera Stachys L., Sideritis L., Ballota and Leucas R. Br. are polyphyletic or paraphyletic. The results were used to examine evolution of non-molecular characters.10aCharacter Evolution10aChloroplast Dna10aClassification10aEremostachys Bunge10aHawaiian Endemic Mints10aLamiaceae10aLamioideae10aMolecular Phylogeneties10aMorphology10aPericarp Structure10aPhlomis L10aPogostemonoideae10aRps16 Intron10aSequence Data10aSubtribe Melittidinae Labiatae10aSystematic Implications10aVerbenaceae1 aScheen, Anne-Cathrine1 aBendiksby, Mika1 aRyding, Olof1 aMathiesen, Cecilie1 aAlbert, Victor, A1 aLindqvist, Charlotte  uhttp://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/200717402149nas a2200337   4500008004100000245011500041210006900156260000800225300001400233490000700247520112600254653002301380653001601403653001801419653001801437653001001455653000801465653001401473653002601487653001401513653001101527653001301538653001401551100002101565700001801586700001901604700001901623700001701642700001701659856013501676       2010                        eng d00aMorphological, karyological and phylogenetic evaluation of Cyclotrichium: a piece in the tribe Mentheae puzzle0 aMorphological karyological and phylogenetic evaluation of Cyclot  cJan  a159–1700 v343 aThe genus Cyclotrichium, a member of the tribe Mentheae subtribe Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae), was analysed with respect to morphological revision, phylogenetic analysis, and cytogenetic properties. All species of the genus were investigated for morphological characters and ITS (internal transcribed spacers) of nrDNA sequence comparison (except C. hausknechtii for ITS). Six members of the genus were also analysed for chromosome numbers. The combined results strongly suggested that Cyclotrichium is a separate genus in Nepetoideae with distinct morphological, phylogenetic, and cytogenetic characteristics. For intrageneric phylogeny of Cyclotrichium, 3 groups were recognised: 1. C. niveum; 2. C. origanifolium; and 3. the remaining 6 species. Clinopodium s.l. and Mentha appear to be most closely related to Cyclotrichium. The phylogenetic relationship of Cyclotrichium with Clinopodium s.l., Mentha, Micromeria, Melissa, and Satureja is discussed. This is the first report on the somatic chromosome numbers of 6 Cyclotrichium species and phylogenetic analysis of Cyclotrichium based on (nrDNA) ITS sequences.10aChromosome-Numbers10aClinopodium10aCyclotrichium10aEssential Oil10aFlora10aIts10aLamiaceae10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aPhylogeny10aRegion10aSatureja10aSequences1 aDirmenci, Tuncay1 aDundar, Ekrem1 aDeniz, Goerkem1 aArabaci, Turan1 aMartin, Esra1 aJamzad, Ziba  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/morphological-karyological-and-phylogenetic-evaluation-cyclotrichium-piece-tribe-mentheae03693nas a2200205   4500008004100000245011100041210007100152300001400223490000700237520294500244653002603189653001403215653001403229653002403243653001303267100002603280700002103306700002003327856014003347       2010                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae (Lamiaceae, Nepetoideae, Mentheae)–taxonomy, biogeography and conflicts0 aMolecular phylogeny of Menthinae Lamiaceae Nepetoideae Mentheae–  a501–5230 v553 aAlthough the subfamily Nepetoideae (Lamiaceae) is considered to be monophyletic, relationships between tribes, subtribes and genera within the subfamily are poorly understood as complex and possi- bly homoplasious morphological characters make taxa difficult to delimit. DNA sequence data from three regions (chloroplast: trnK intron; trnL-F; nuclear: ITS) in total including 278 accessions, representing 38 out of 40 genera of subtribe Menthinae and 11 outgroup genera, were used to reconstruct the evolution- ary history, test previous hypotheses of classification, explain biogeographic patterns and elucidate char- acter evolution. Using maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian analysis phylogenetic reconstructions based on nuclear and chloroplast sequence data were incongruent, consequently the data were analyzed separately.
Both nuclear and chloroplast datasets provide strong support for three major lineages: the ``Satureja'', ``Micromeria'' and ``Clinopodium'' group. The first contains members of Satureja and Gontscharovia. In the second lineage Micromeria s.str. and Origanum were resolved as monophyletic, Pentapleura and Zataria indicated as sister groups. Thymbra includes two species of Satureja turning the latter genus polyphyletic. Thymus is revealed as paraphyletic with respect to Argantoniella and Saccocalyx in both and Origanum in the plastid dataset only. In the third lineage, the Clinopodium-group, branching pattern is highly incon- gruent among datasets and possibly influenced by recent and ancient hybridization, chloroplast capture and incomplete lineage sorting. However, identical terminal groups are inferred in both analyses. A Madagascan lineage of ``Micromeria'', sister to the recently described South African Killickia, is suggested to represent a new genus. The Himalayan Clinopodium nepalense group and the tropical African C. abyssinicum alliance are monophyletic but indicated in different positions. Both groups appear in the ITS phylogeny in a clade with Cyclotrichium and Mentha, relationships not suggested previously. The enig- matic Micromeria cymuligera is close to Mentha and possibly is a representative of this genus. Species of Acinos, now regarded as part of Clinopodium, are mixed up with species of Ziziphora, questioning either the inclusion of Acinos in Clinopodium or generic distinctness of Ziziphora. All data sets suggest a mono- phyly of the New World taxa and argue for long distance dispersal from the Old World, rather than a vicariance explanation. Bystropogon marks the split up between the two lineages. Inclusion of 22 genera intermixed with Clinopodium spp. in the New World clade provides evidence that the current circum- scription of the genus is highly unnatural. Low sequence divergence resulting in low phylogenetic reso- lution especially at the base of the clade indicate a rapid radiation accompanied by considerable ecological diversification and speciation.10aGeneric delimitations10aLamiaceae10aMenthinae10aMolecular phylogeny10aSatureja1 aBräuchler, Christian1 aMeimberg, Harald1 aHeubl, Günther  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/molecular-phylogeny-menthinae-lamiaceae-nepetoideae-mentheae%E2%80%93taxonomy-biogeography-and