TY - JOUR T1 - Parsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae) JF - Am J Bot Y1 - 1995 A1 - SJ WAGSTAFF A1 - RG OLMSTEAD A1 - PD CANTINO SP - 886–892 KW - Classification KW - Dna KW - Evolution KW - Lamiaceae KW - Phylogeny AB - Parsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation supports monophyly of subfamily Nepetoideae, However, a close relationship among Nepetoideae and other gynobasic-styled Labiatae is not supported, indicating that a gynobasic style has evolved independently in at least two clades of Labiatae. The inferred relationships are congruent with the classification of Cantino, Harley, and Wagstaff (1992, Advances in labiate sciences, 27-37, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) but conflict to varying degrees with traditional classifications. Monophyly of four tribes of Nepetoideae also is supported. VL - 82 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Monophyly and phylogeny of Monarda (Lamiaceae): Evidence from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA JF - Systematic Botany Y1 - 2002 A1 - LA Prather A1 - AK Monfils A1 - AL Posto A1 - RA Williams SP - 127–137 KW - Classification KW - Evolution KW - Gene Trees KW - Islands KW - Labiatae KW - Molecular Systematics KW - Most-Parsimonious Trees KW - Patterns KW - Sequence Data KW - Species Trees AB - The phylogenetic relationships of the 16 species of Monarda (Lamiaceae) were investigated using sequences of the internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Thymus and Mentha were used as outgroups, and Blephilia, Clinopodium, Conradina, Hesperozygis, Monardella, Pycnanthemum, and Ziziphora were included in the ingroup to test the monophyly of Monarda. Two parsimony searches were performed after removing redundant sequences from the analysis: one with indels scored as missing and a second with indels treated as binary characters, Both searches yielded congruent results, but the treatment of indels as binary characters resulted in considerably more resolution within Monarda. There was strong support for the monophyly of Monarda and a close relationship was found between Monarda, Blephilia, and Pycnanthemum. The molecular phylogeny was completely congruent with the infrageneric classification of the genus. Our results were consistent with hypotheses of hybridization between M. fistulosa and M. lindheimeri in Texas. Despite considerable morphological variation among many species, especially in floral characters, little molecular diversification was found in those same species groups. Intraspecific polymorphism in ITS sequence was found in over half the species examined, and may be attributable to ancestral polymorphism, hybridization, or detection of paralogous loci. VL - 27 UR - http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000174306000012&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Molecular phylogeny and taxonomy of the genus Lamium L. (Lamiaceae): Disentangling origins of presumed allotetraploids JF - Taxon Y1 - 2011 A1 - Mika Bendiksby A1 - Anne K Brysting A1 - Lisbeth Thorbek A1 - Galina Gussarova A1 - Olof Ryding SP - 986–1000 KW - 5S-Nts KW - Allopolyploidy KW - Asteraceae KW - Chloroplast Dna KW - Classification KW - Complex KW - Cpdna KW - Dna-Sequences KW - Incongruence KW - Lamioideae KW - Lamium KW - Molecular Phylogenetics KW - Nrpa2 KW - Reconstruction KW - Reticulate Evolution KW - Silene Caryophyllaceae KW - Speciation AB - This is the first comprehensive molecular investigation of the genus Lamium L. We have addressed phylogenetic relationships and presumed allopolyploid speciation by use of nuclear (NRPA2, 5S-NTS) and chloroplast (matK, psbA-trnH, rps16, trnL, trnL-F, trnS-G) DNA sequence data. Nuclear and chloroplast data were incongruent, and nuclear data showed better correlation with morphology. Bayesian and parsimony phylogenetic results show that (I) Lamium galeobdolon is sister to all remaining Lamium species; (2) Wiedemannia is nested within Lamium; (3) L. amplexicaule is polyphyletic; (4) most tetraploids are of hybrid origin; (5) L. amplexicaule var. orientale is allotetraploid; and (6) Mennema's (1989) infrageneric classification is not corroborated by molecular data. Based on the molecular results, and taking morphology into account, we suggest resurrection of two species: L. aleppicum and L. paczoskianum. VL - 60 UR - http://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=2B%2540kNem2NICHnHfl3PI&product=WOS&UT=000294507000004&SrcApp=Papers&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_images%252Fwok5_failed_auth.html&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&SrcAuth=meken ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Pericarp structure and phylogeny of the Lamiaceae-Verbenaceae-complex JF - Plant Systematics and Evolution Y1 - 1995 A1 - O Ryding SP - 101–141 KW - Anatomy KW - Chloanthoideae KW - Classification KW - Labiatae KW - Lamiaceae KW - Lamioideae KW - Morphology KW - Nepetoideae KW - Pericarp KW - Phylogeny KW - Pogostemonoideae KW - Rbcl KW - Scutellarioideae KW - Sequences KW - Verbenaceae AB - Pericarp structure was investigated in 158 species of the families Lamiaceae and Verbenaceae. Data from 221 out of 262 genera of Lamiaceae s.l. and a few of Verbenaceae s.str. were collected in a table. A cladistic analysis was performed on the basis of pericarp characters only. The abandonment of subfam. Pogostemonoideae as a taxonomic unit is considered. Examples of groups given additional support by similarities in pericarp characters are: (1) the gynobasic-styled labiates (subfamilies Pogostemonoideae, Lamioi deae, Nepetoideae); (2) a Lamioideae-Pogostemonoideae-group; (3) Nepetoideae; (4) a Westringia-Hemigenia-Hemiandra-Microcorys group (in subfam. Chloranthoideae); (5) a Lepechinia-Chaunostoma-group (in Nepetoideae); (6) a Prunella-Cleonia-group (in Nepetoideae). VL - 198 UR - http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=A1995TN62000006&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image ER - TY - JOUR T1 - An updated phylogeny and classification of Lamiaceae subfamily Lamioideae JF - Taxon Y1 - 2011 A1 - Mika Bendiksby A1 - Lisbeth Thorbek A1 - Anne-Cathrine Scheen A1 - Charlotte Lindqvist A1 - Olof Ryding SP - 471–484 KW - Acanthoprasium KW - Chloroplast Sequence Datasets KW - Classification KW - Dna KW - Eriophyton KW - Evolution KW - Hawaiian Endemic Mints KW - Labiatae KW - Lamiaceae KW - Lamioideae KW - Matsumurella KW - Molecular Phylogenetics KW - Moluccella KW - Nuclear KW - Origin KW - Paraphlomideae KW - Pericarp Structure KW - Sideritis Lamiaceae AB - Lamioideae comprise the second-largest subfamily in Lamiaceae. Although considerable progress has recently been made in Lamioideae phylogenetics, the subfamily remains one of the most poorly investigated subfamilies in Lamiaceae. Here we present a taxonomic update of the subfamily based on earlier published data as well as 71 new DNA extracts from relevant in- and outgroup taxa, and DNA sequence data from four chloroplast regions (matK, rps16, trnL intron and trnL-F spacer). The phylogenetic positions of 10 out of 13 previously unplaced small or monotypic Asian lamioid genera and 37 additional lamioid species have been identified, and the classification is updated accordingly. Results from parsimony and Bayesian phylogenetic methods corroborate earlier results, but phylogenetic resolution as well as overall branch support are improved. All newly added genera are assigned to earlier established tribes or the new tribe Paraphlomideae Bendiksby, which includes Ajugoides, Matsumurella and Paraphlomis. Acanthoprasium is resurrected as a genus. Transfer of species is proposed to accommodate the monophyly of two genera (Lamium, Otostegia), whereas ten genera remain non-monophyletic (Ballota s.str., Lagopsis, Leonotis, Leonurus, Leucas, Microtoena, Phlomoides, Sideritis, Stachys, Thuspeinanta). Eriophyton and Stachyopsis have been included in Lamieae, Hypogomphia in Stachydeae, and Loxocalyx in Leonureae. Betonica, Colquhounia, Galeopsis, and Roylea remain unclassified at the tribal level. Lamium chinense and three East Asian Galeobdolon species are transferred to Matsumurella. Sulaimania and four Otostegia species are transferred to Moluccella. Alajja and three Lamium species are transferred to Eriophyton. In total, 14 new combinations are made, one at the rank of subgenus and 13 at the rank of species. VL - 60 UR - http://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=2B%2540kNem2NICHnHfl3PI&product=WOS&UT=000289587100015&SrcApp=Papers&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_images%252Fwok5_failed_auth.html&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&SrcAuth=meken ER - TY - JOUR T1 - MOLECULAR PHYLOGENETICS, CHARACTER EVOLUTION, AND SUPRAGENERIC CLASSIFICATION OF LAMIOIDEAE (LAMIACEAE) JF - Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden Y1 - 2010 DO - 10.3417/2007174 A1 - Anne-Cathrine Scheen A1 - Mika Bendiksby A1 - Olof Ryding A1 - Cecilie Mathiesen A1 - Victor A Albert A1 - Charlotte Lindqvist SP - 191–217 KW - Character Evolution KW - Chloroplast Dna KW - Classification KW - Eremostachys Bunge KW - Hawaiian Endemic Mints KW - Lamiaceae KW - Lamioideae KW - Molecular Phylogeneties KW - Morphology KW - Pericarp Structure KW - Phlomis L KW - Pogostemonoideae KW - Rps16 Intron KW - Sequence Data KW - Subtribe Melittidinae Labiatae KW - Systematic Implications KW - Verbenaceae AB - This paper presents a phylogenetic analysis of Lamiaceae subfam. Lamioideae (including subfamily Pogostemonoideae) based on sequences of the trnL intron, trnL-trnF intergenic spacer, and rps16 intron of the plastid genuine. It is the first analysis that includes all major lamioid and pogostemonoid genera. Monophyly of Lamioideae s.l. (i.e., including Pogostemonoideae) is strongly supported, with Cymaria Benth. as its sister group, and Pogostemonoideae, which sometimes has been recognized as a subfamily, is subsumed in Lamioideae. On the basis of the phylogenetic hypothesis, Lamioideae is divided into nine tribes. Three new tribes are established: Gomphostemmateae Seheen {&} Lindqvist, Phlomideae Mathiesen, and Leucadeae Scheen {&} Ryding. The other six tribes are: Pogostemoneae Briq., Synandreae Raf., Staehydeae Dumort., Leonureae Dumort., Limieae Coss. {&} Germ., and Marrubieae Vis. The genus Betonica L. is reestablished. The results also strongly suggest that the genera Stachys L., Sideritis L., Ballota and Leucas R. Br. are polyphyletic or paraphyletic. The results were used to examine evolution of non-molecular characters. VL - 97 UR - http://www.bioone.org/doi/abs/10.3417/2007174 ER - TY - JOUR T1 - Phylogeny in Labiatae sl, inferred from cpDNA sequences JF - Plant Systematics and Evolution Y1 - 1998 A1 - SJ WAGSTAFF A1 - L Hickerson A1 - R Spangler A1 - PA Reeves A1 - RG OLMSTEAD SP - 265–274 KW - Asteridae KW - Cladistics KW - Classification KW - Cpdna KW - Labiatae KW - Lamiaceae KW - Ndhf KW - Parsimony Analysis KW - Phylogeny KW - Rbcl AB - Sequences of rbcL and ndhF were analysed independently and in combination to resolve phylogenetic relationships in Labiatae s. 1. Monophyly of Labiatae s. 1 was supported by all three analyses. Congea tomentosa (Symphoremataceae) is nested within Labiatae s. 1. in the rbcL analysis, but emerges as the sister group of Labiatae s. 1. in the ndhF and combined analyses. Four noteworthy clades of Labiate s. 1. also are supported by all analyses corresponding to subfamilies Nepetoideae, Lamioideae, Pogostemonoideae and Scutellarioideae. Monophyly of subfamilies Chloanthoideae and Viticoideae is not supported. A clade comprising Teucrioideae plus Ajuga is supported by ndhF and the combined analysis. VL - 209 UR - http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000072628900007&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image ER -