01296nas a2200217   4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260000800205300001400213490000700227520059700234653001900831653000800850653001400858653001400872653001400886100001700900700001700917700001600934856012800950       1995                        eng d00aParsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae)0 aParsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfam  cJan  a886–8920 v823 aParsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation supports monophyly of subfamily Nepetoideae, However, a close relationship among Nepetoideae and other gynobasic-styled Labiatae is not supported, indicating that a gynobasic style has evolved independently in at least two clades of Labiatae. The inferred relationships are congruent with the classification of Cantino, Harley, and Wagstaff (1992, Advances in labiate sciences, 27-37, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) but conflict to varying degrees with traditional classifications. Monophyly of four tribes of Nepetoideae also is supported.10aClassification10aDna10aEvolution10aLamiaceae10aPhylogeny1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aCANTINO, PD  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/parsimony-analysis-cpdna-restriction-site-variation-subfamily-nepetoideae-labiatae02268nas a2200193   4500008004100000245013200041210006900173260000800242300001400250490000700264520153700271100002201808700001901830700002901849700002001878700002301898700002201921856013101943       2007                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny, biogeography, and systematics of Dicerandra (Lamiaceae), a genus endemic to the southeastern United States0 aMolecular phylogeny biogeography and systematics of Dicerandra L  cJun  a1017–270 v943 aDicerandra, an endemic mint of the southeastern United States, comprises nine species, all of which are threatened or endangered and restricted to sandhill vegetation and a mosaic of scrub habitats. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Dicerandra based on data from the nuclear and plastid genomes for all 13 taxa of the genus, identified two strongly supported clades, corresponding to the four annual and to the five perennial species of Dicerandra. However, the nuclear and plastid trees were incongruent in their placement of two perennial taxa, D. cornutissima and D. immaculata var. savannarum, perhaps due to ancient hybridization or to lineage sorting. Based on these analyses, the widespread D. linearifolia is not monophyletic, with populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia falling into either western or eastern clades. The western clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia and var. robustior, occurs in an area drained by rivers flowing toward the Gulf of Mexico, whereas the eastern clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia, D. densiflora, D. odoratissima, and D. radfordiana (i.e., all the annual species), occupies a region drained by rivers flowing to the Atlantic Ocean. Although this pattern of genetic differentiation between populations from these two river drainages has been documented in several animal species, it has not previously been reported for plants. A revised subgeneric classification is presented to reflect the annual and perennial clades.1 aOliveira, Luiz, O1 aHuck, Robin, B1 aGitzendanner, Matthew, A1 aJudd, Walter, S1 aSoltis, Douglas, E1 aSoltis, Pamela, S  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/molecular-phylogeny-biogeography-and-systematics-dicerandra-lamiaceae-genus-endemic-002797nas a2200361   4500008004100000245013300041210006900174260000800243300001600251490000700267520153700274653001701811653002001828653001701848653001501865653002001880653001201900653001501912653003201927653001301959653002101972653000901993653001002002653001402012653001402026100002202040700001902062700002902081700002002110700002302130700002202153856026002175       2007                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny, biogeography, and systematics of Dicerandra (Lamiaceae), a genus endemic to the southeastern United States'0 aMolecular phylogeny biogeography and systematics of Dicerandra L  cJan  a1017–10270 v943 aDicerandra, an endemic mint of the southeastern United States, comprises nine species, all of which are threatened or endangered and restricted to sandhill vegetation and a mosaic of scrub habitats. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of Dicerandra based on data from the nuclear and plastid genomes for all 13 taxa of the genus, identified two strongly supported clades, corresponding to the four annual and to the five perennial species of Dicerandra. However, the nuclear and plastid trees were incongruent in their placement of two perennial taxa, D. cornutissima and D. immaculata var. savannarum, perhaps due to ancient hybridization or to lineage sorting. Based on these analyses, the widespread D. linearifolia is not monophyletic, with populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia falling into either western or eastern clades. The western clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia and var. robustior, occurs in an area drained by rivers flowing toward the Gulf of Mexico, whereas the eastern clade, comprising populations of D. linearifolia var. linearifolia, D. densiflora, D. odoratissima, and D. radfordiana (i.e., all the annual species), occupies a region drained by rivers flowing to the Atlantic Ocean. Although this pattern of genetic differentiation between populations from these two river drainages has been documented in several animal species, it has not previously been reported for plants. A revised subgeneric classification is presented to reflect the annual and perennial clades.10aBiogeography10aChloroplast Dna10aConservation10aDicerandra10aEndemic Species10aFlorida10aInferences10aInternal Transcribed Spacer10aLabiatae10aLake Wales Ridge10aMatk10aPlant10aSequences10aTrnt-Trnl1 aOliveira, Luiz, O1 aHuck, Robin, B1 aGitzendanner, Matthew, A1 aJudd, Walter, S1 aSoltis, Douglas, E1 aSoltis, Pamela, S  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000249830600013&SID=2ABa3P2LDb%2540FhI56hhg&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_i02156nas a2200289   4500008004100000245007900041210006900120260000800189300001600197490000700213520134500220653000901565653002301574653002201597653001801619653001401637653001001651653001101661653001401672653000901686653000901695100001401704700001201718700001401730700001601744856010601760       2002                        eng d00aHybridization in the section Mentha (Lamiaceae) inferred from AFLP markers0 aHybridization in the section Mentha Lamiaceae inferred from AFLP  cJan  a2017–20230 v893 aThe amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) method was used to evaluate genetic diversity and to assess genetic relationships within the section Mentha in order to clarify the taxonomy of several interspecific mint hybrids with molecular markers. To this end, genetic diversity of 62 Mentha accessions from different geographic origins, representing five species and three hybrids, was assessed. Three EcoRI/MseI AFLP primer combinations generated an average of 40 AFLP markers per primer combination, ranging in size from 50 to 500 base pairs (bp). The percentage of markers polymorphic ranged from 50% to 60% across all accessions studied. According to phenetic and cladistic analysis, the 62 mint accessions were grouped into two major clusters. Principal coordinates analysis separated species into well-defined groups, and clear relationships between species and hybrids could be described. Our AFLP analysis supports taxonomic classification established among Mentha species by conventional (morphological, cytological, and chemical) methods. It allows the assessment of phenetic relationships between species and the hybrids M. spicata and M. X piperita, largely cultivated all over the world for their menthol source, and provides new insights into the subdivision of M. spicata, based for the first time on molecular markers.10aAflp10aDna Fingerprinting10aGenetic Diversity10aHybridization10aLamiaceae10aLines10aMentha10aPolyploid10aRapd10aRflp1 aGobert, V1 aMoja, S1 aColson, M1 aTaberlet, P  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/hybridization-section-mentha-lamiaceae-inferred-aflp-markers01781nas a2200181   4500008004100000245004300041210004300084300000800127490000700135520128400142100001701426700002001443700001401463700001401477700001601491700001501507856007701522       2001                        eng d00aDisintegration of the Scrophulariaceae0 aDisintegration of the Scrophulariaceae  a3480 v883 aA molecular systematic study of Scrophulariaceae sensu lato using DNA sequences of three plastid genes (rbcL, ndhF, and rps2) revealed at least five distinct monophyletic groups. Thirty-nine genera representing 24 tribes of the Scrophulariaceae s.l. (sensu lato) were analyzed along with representatives of 15 other families of Lamiales. The Scrophulariaceae s.s. (sensu stricto) include part or all of tribes Aptosimeae, Hemimerideae, Leucophylleae, Manuleae, Selagineae, and Verbasceae (= Scrophularieae) and the conventional families Buddlejaceae and Myoporaceae. Veronicaceae includes all or part of tribes Angelonieae, Antirrhineae, Cheloneae, Digitaleae, and Gratioleae and the conventional families Callitrichaceae, Globulariaceae, Hippuridaceae, and Plantaginaceae. The Orobanchaceae include tribes Buchnereae, Rhinantheae, and the conventional Orobanchaceae. All sampled members of Orobanchaceae are parasitic, except Lindenbergia, which is sister to the rest of the family. Family Calceolariaceae Olmstead is newly erected herein to recognize the phylogenetic distinctiveness of tribe Calceolarieae. The Calceolariaceae are close to the base of the Lamiales. The Stilbaceae are expanded by the inclusion of Halleria. Mimulus does not belong in any of these five groups.1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 adePamphilis, CW1 aWolfe, AD1 aYoung, ND1 aElisons, WJ1 aReeves, PA  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/disintegration-scrophulariaceae