02473nas a2200289   4500008004100000245013600041210006900177260000800246300001400254490000700268520140900275653001901684653001401703653001501717653001201732653001301744653002601757653002801783653001301811653001801824653001801842100001601860700001601876700001401892700001701906856026001923       2002                        eng d00aMonophyly and phylogeny of Monarda (Lamiaceae): Evidence from the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region of nuclear ribosomal DNA0 aMonophyly and phylogeny of Monarda Lamiaceae Evidence from the i  cJan  a127–1370 v273 aThe phylogenetic relationships of the 16 species of Monarda (Lamiaceae) were investigated using sequences of the internal transcribed spacer regions of nuclear ribosomal DNA. Thymus and Mentha were used as outgroups, and Blephilia, Clinopodium, Conradina, Hesperozygis, Monardella, Pycnanthemum, and Ziziphora were included in the ingroup to test the monophyly of Monarda. Two parsimony searches were performed after removing redundant sequences from the analysis: one with indels scored as missing and a second with indels treated as binary characters, Both searches yielded congruent results, but the treatment of indels as binary characters resulted in considerably more resolution within Monarda. There was strong support for the monophyly of Monarda and a close relationship was found between Monarda, Blephilia, and Pycnanthemum. The molecular phylogeny was completely congruent with the infrageneric classification of the genus. Our results were consistent with hypotheses of hybridization between M. fistulosa and M. lindheimeri in Texas. Despite considerable morphological variation among many species, especially in floral characters, little molecular diversification was found in those same species groups. Intraspecific polymorphism in ITS sequence was found in over half the species examined, and may be attributable to ancestral polymorphism, hybridization, or detection of paralogous loci.10aClassification10aEvolution10aGene Trees10aIslands10aLabiatae10aMolecular Systematics10aMost-Parsimonious Trees10aPatterns10aSequence Data10aSpecies Trees1 aPrather, LA1 aMonfils, AK1 aPosto, AL1 aWilliams, RA  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000174306000012&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image03006nas a2200277   4500008004100000245014900041210006900190260000800259300001400267490000700281520191100288653002702199653002002226653001702246653002702263653002302290653002202313653002202335653002602357653002502383653001402408100001602422700001502438700001502453856026002468       2006                        eng d00aMolecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints (Lamiaceae) from the southeastern USA: Evidence for hybridization in Pleistocene refugia?0 aMolecular phylogeny of Conradina and other scrub mints Lamiaceae  cJan  a193–2070 v313 aConradina (Lamiaceae) consists of six allopatric species endemic to the southeastern United States, four of which are federally endangered or threatened. The limits and status of several taxa have been contested based on morphological grounds, and clarification of these limits is necessary for the design and implementation of effective and fiscally responsible protection and management plans. The objectives of this study were to investigate the monophyly of Conradina and its relationship to other endemic mints of the southeastern United States, to understand the patterns of diversification in Conradina, and to clarify species relationships. A molecular phylogeny was inferred by sequencing ITS and plastid regions from multiple accessions of each species of Conradina (except for a single accession of C. verticillata) and multiple individuals from species of Clinopodium, Dicerandra, Piloblephis, Stachydeoma, Monarda, Pycnanthemum, and Mentha. ITS sequence data strongly support the monophyly of Conradina, in agreement with evidence from morphology. In contrast, plastid sequence data do not support a monophyletic Conradina and place the genus as paraphyletic to Clinopodium, Stachydeoma, and Piloblephis. Similar plastid haplotypes are shared by different genera, perhaps due to shared ancestral polymorphisms, or more likely, introgression that occurred recently or during the Pleistocene. Within Conradina, ITS sequence data do not resolve species relationships, while plastid sequence data do not support the monophyly of most traditionally defined species of Conradina that are distinguishable morphologically. Species relationships in the plastid data set may also be obscured by introgression or ancestral polymorphism. More rapidly evolving sequence data from nuclear markers will be necessary to clarify relationships in Conradina and related mints from the southeastern United States.10aArmeria Plumbaginaceae10aChloroplast Dna10aIncongruence10aLength Difference Test10aMaximum-Likelihood10aMitochondrial-Dna10aNoncoding Regions10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aReticulate Evolution10aSequences1 aEdwards, CE1 aSoltis, DE1 aSoltis, PS  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000236119500018&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image00410nas a2200109   4500008004100000245006400041210006200105300001200167490000600179100001500185856010000200       1976                        eng d00aChromosome numbers of Hedeoma (Labiatae) and related genera0 aChromosome numbers of Hedeoma Labiatae and related genera  a46–560 v11 aIrving, RS  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/chromosome-numbers-hedeoma-labiatae-and-related-genera02786nas a2200301   4500008004100000245016200041210006900203260000800272300001400280490000700294520158600301653001901887653002001906653002601926653003201952653002601984653002302010653003102033653003102064653001802095653001902113100001502132700001702147700001502164700002102179700002402200856026002224       2004                        eng d00aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian genus Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) to the New World: A case of conflicting phylogenies0 aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the M  cJan  a702–7150 v293 aBystropogon (Lamiaceae) is endemic to the Macaronesian Islands and represents the best-known example of a putative phytogeographic connection between these islands and the New World. Previous morphological taxonomic studies suggested that this genus is closely related to the western South American Minthostachys. Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S subunit of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL gene and trnL-trnF spacer of the chloroplast genome for 33 of the 72 genera in the Mentheae tribe were performed. Maximum parsimony analysis of the combined data set resulted in 63 most parsimonious trees. The strict consensus tree of this analysis shows with moderate bootstrap support (74%) that Bystropogon is sister to the Old World taxa Acinos, Ziziphora, and Clinopodium vulgare. When analyzed separately, the ITS and trnL/F data sets do not agree as to the sister group to Bystropogon, although none supports a sister relationship with Minthostachys. The cpDNA phylogeny strongly supports a relationship of Bystropogon with a clade of New World mint taxa (90% bootstrap value). Due to the apparent conflict between the chloroplast and nuclear characters observed in the phylogenies, we are not certain of the true biogeographic relationship of Bystropogon. Finally, in all analyses, all of the Mentheae genera sampled in this study form a monophyletic group (100% bootstrap value) and a derived clade of ten New World genera is found. These results contribute to our understanding of generic relationships within the tribe.10aCanary-Islands10aChloroplast Dna10aIlex L. Aquifoliaceae10aInternal Transcribed Spacer10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aParsimony Analysis10aPollen Wall Ultrastructure10aRestriction-Site Variation10aSequence Data10aSubgenus Pinus1 aTrusty, JL1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aBogler, DJ1 aSantos-Guerra, A1 aFrancisco-Ortega, J  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000223702400014&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image01999nas a2200277   4500008004100000245007200041210006900113260000800182300001400190490000700204520104600211653001801257653001701275653002001292653001401312653001301326653001001339653001401349653001201363653001001375653001401385653001401399100002601413700002201439856026001461       2009                        eng d00aMolecular Phylogenetics of the Leucas Group (Lamioideae; Lamiaceae)0 aMolecular Phylogenetics of the Leucas Group Lamioideae Lamiaceae  cJan  a173–1810 v343 aThe genus Leucas R.Br. includes 100 recognized species ranging in distribution from Africa through the Indian subcontinent to Queensland, Australia. Morphological cladistic studies have suggested that several other genera of Lamioideae - Acrotome, Isoleucas, Leonotis, and Otostegia (pro parte) - may be closely related to Leucas, or even nested within it. Here we use phylogenetic analysis of three plastid DNA loci, the trnL-F region, trnS-G spacer, and the rps16 intron and reach similar conclusions. Many of the morphological features used to maintain Leucas since 1810 are shared ancestral (symplesiomorphic) characters. The other genera (or subgeneric group in the case of Otostegia) are therefore defined by apomorphic states. This is particularly apparent in the case of Leonotis, with its highly specialized bird-pollinated flowers, derived within a paraphyletic and insect-pollinated Leucas. Some geographically isolated groups are monophyletic, including all Asian species of Leucas, a Socotran clade, and a large African lineage.10aAmplification10aBiogeography10aChloroplast Dna10aEvolution10aLabiatae10aMints10aParsimony10aRegions10aRps1610aTrnl-Trnf10aTrns-Trng1 aScheen, Anne-Cathrine1 aAlbert, Victor, A  uhttp://apps.webofknowledge.com/InboundService.do?SID=2B%2540kNem2NICHnHfl3PI&product=WOS&UT=000263801200018&SrcApp=Papers&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_images%252Fwok5_failed_auth.html&Init=Yes&action=retrieve&SrcAuth=meken01510nas a2200133   4500008004100000245007100041210006900112300001400181490000700195520103600202100001701238700001701255856010401272       1997                        eng d00aPhylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae Inferred from rbcL Sequences0 aPhylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae Inferred from rbcL Sequenc  a165–1790 v223 aParsimony analysis of rbcL sequences supports monophyly of the Labiatae s.l., which includes the Labiatae, subfamilies Caryopteridoideae, Chloanthoideae, and Viticoideae of the Verbenaceae, and Symphoremataceae. Representatives of subfamily Verbenoideae (Verbenaceae s. str.) do not form a monophyletic group with the Labiatae s.l. Avicennia (Avicenniaceae), Cyclocheilon (Nesogenaceae), and Euthystachys and Retzia (Stilbaceae), included in the Verbenaceae by many authors, are distinct from the Labiatae s.l. and Verbenaceae s. str. The inferred phylogeny also provides a framework to interpret character evolution. Results suggest that uniovulate locules have evolved in at least two lineages of Lamiales s.l. and that a gynoecium with four locules by the development of false partitions apparently has evolved independently in the Labiatae s.l. and the Verbenaceae s. str. Whereas a dry fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Lamiales s.l., a fleshy fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Labiatae s.l. with possible reversal in four lineages.1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ1 aOLMSTEAD, RG  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/phylogeny-labiatae-and-verbenaceae-inferred-rbcl-sequences00409nas a2200121   4500008004100000245005100041210004900092300001100141100001500152700001800167700001500185856008700200       1979                        eng d00aArtificial hybridization in Hedeoma (Labiatae)0 aArtificial hybridization in Hedeoma Labiatae  a1–151 aIrving, RS1 aBrenholts, HS1 aIrving, DD  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/artificial-hybridization-hedeoma-labiatae02099nas a2200169   4500008004100000245014200041210006900183260000800252300001100260490000700271520142600278100002601704700002001730700002301750700002001773856013601793       2009                        eng d00aUsing population genetic data as a tool to identify new species: Conradina cygniflora (Lamiaceae), a new, endangered species from Florida0 aUsing population genetic data as a tool to identify new species   cSep  a1–130 v343 aUnderstanding species limits in recent radiations is often difficult because sufficient time may not have elapsed since speciation to allow for the accumulation of unique species-specific traits. However, because population genetic markers evolve rapidly, patterns of genetic structure based on these markers can often discern genetically isolated population groups, even when other markers, such as DNA sequences, can not. In this study, we analyzed patterns of genetic structure based on microsatellites in Conradina and identified a group of plants in Dunns Creek State Park (Putnam County, Florida) that are genetically divergent from all other described Conradina species. We then carried out a mor- phological study that revealed several unique characters in these populations, most notably unicellular hairs, epidermis features, and larger calyces. Because these populations are genetically and morphologically diagnosable from all other Conradina species, we thus consider them to be specifically distinct, and name this taxon Conradina cygniflora. Conradina cygniflora is endemic to Dunns Creek State Park in south- central Putnam County, Florida, where it occupies eight tightly-clustered sites that probably form around two to four self-sustaining popula- tions. Due to its extremely limited geographic distribution and few individuals, we recommend that Conradina cygniflora be listed as federally endangered.1 aEdwards, Christine, E1 aJudd, Walter, S1 aIonta, Gretchen, M1 aHerring, Brenda  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/using-population-genetic-data-tool-identify-new-species-conradina-cygniflora-lamiaceae-new