00554nas a2200145   4500008004100000245008800041210006900129300001300198490000700211100001500218700001700233700001800250700001700268856012300285       1999                        eng d00aMolecular systematics of Clerodendrum (Lamiaceae): ITS sequences and total evidence0 aMolecular systematics of Clerodendrum Lamiaceae ITS sequences an  a98–1070 v861 aSteane, DA1 aScotland, RW1 aMabberley, DJ1 aOLMSTEAD, RG  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/molecular-systematics-clerodendrum-lamiaceae-its-sequences-and-total-evidence01296nas a2200217   4500008004100000245009500041210006900136260000800205300001400213490000700227520059700234653001900831653000800850653001400858653001400872653001400886100001700900700001700917700001600934856012800950       1995                        eng d00aParsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae)0 aParsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfam  cJan  a886–8920 v823 aParsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation supports monophyly of subfamily Nepetoideae, However, a close relationship among Nepetoideae and other gynobasic-styled Labiatae is not supported, indicating that a gynobasic style has evolved independently in at least two clades of Labiatae. The inferred relationships are congruent with the classification of Cantino, Harley, and Wagstaff (1992, Advances in labiate sciences, 27-37, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) but conflict to varying degrees with traditional classifications. Monophyly of four tribes of Nepetoideae also is supported.10aClassification10aDna10aEvolution10aLamiaceae10aPhylogeny1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aCANTINO, PD  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/parsimony-analysis-cpdna-restriction-site-variation-subfamily-nepetoideae-labiatae00550nas a2200121   4500008004100000245013700041210006900178300001200247490000700259100001300266700001700279856013200296       2008                        eng d00aA species-level phylogenetic study of the Verbena complex (Verbenaceae) indicates two independent intergeneric chloroplast transfers0 aspecieslevel phylogenetic study of the Verbena complex Verbenace  a23–330 v481 aYuan, YW1 aOLMSTEAD, RG  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/species-level-phylogenetic-study-verbena-complex-verbenaceae-indicates-two-independent00669nas a2200157   4500008004100000245015000041210006900191300001600260490000700276100001500283700001700298700002100315700001900336700002400355856013200379       2005                        eng d00aMolecular phylogenetics of the Macaronesian-endemic genus Bystropogon(Lamiaceae): palaeo-islands, ecological shifts and interisland colonizations0 aMolecular phylogenetics of the Macaronesianendemic genus Bystrop  a1177–11890 v141 aTrusty, JL1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aSantos-Guerra, A1 aSa-Fontinha, S1 aFrancisco-Ortega, J  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/molecular-phylogenetics-macaronesian-endemic-genus-bystropogonlamiaceae-palaeo-islands02786nas a2200301   4500008004100000245016200041210006900203260000800272300001400280490000700294520158600301653001901887653002001906653002601926653003201952653002601984653002302010653003102033653003102064653001802095653001902113100001502132700001702147700001502164700002102179700002402200856026002224       2004                        eng d00aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian genus Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) to the New World: A case of conflicting phylogenies0 aUsing molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the M  cJan  a702–7150 v293 aBystropogon (Lamiaceae) is endemic to the Macaronesian Islands and represents the best-known example of a putative phytogeographic connection between these islands and the New World. Previous morphological taxonomic studies suggested that this genus is closely related to the western South American Minthostachys. Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S subunit of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL gene and trnL-trnF spacer of the chloroplast genome for 33 of the 72 genera in the Mentheae tribe were performed. Maximum parsimony analysis of the combined data set resulted in 63 most parsimonious trees. The strict consensus tree of this analysis shows with moderate bootstrap support (74%) that Bystropogon is sister to the Old World taxa Acinos, Ziziphora, and Clinopodium vulgare. When analyzed separately, the ITS and trnL/F data sets do not agree as to the sister group to Bystropogon, although none supports a sister relationship with Minthostachys. The cpDNA phylogeny strongly supports a relationship of Bystropogon with a clade of New World mint taxa (90% bootstrap value). Due to the apparent conflict between the chloroplast and nuclear characters observed in the phylogenies, we are not certain of the true biogeographic relationship of Bystropogon. Finally, in all analyses, all of the Mentheae genera sampled in this study form a monophyletic group (100% bootstrap value) and a derived clade of ten New World genera is found. These results contribute to our understanding of generic relationships within the tribe.10aCanary-Islands10aChloroplast Dna10aIlex L. Aquifoliaceae10aInternal Transcribed Spacer10aNuclear Ribosomal Dna10aParsimony Analysis10aPollen Wall Ultrastructure10aRestriction-Site Variation10aSequence Data10aSubgenus Pinus1 aTrusty, JL1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aBogler, DJ1 aSantos-Guerra, A1 aFrancisco-Ortega, J  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000223702400014&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image01510nas a2200133   4500008004100000245007100041210006900112300001400181490000700195520103600202100001701238700001701255856010401272       1997                        eng d00aPhylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae Inferred from rbcL Sequences0 aPhylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae Inferred from rbcL Sequenc  a165–1790 v223 aParsimony analysis of rbcL sequences supports monophyly of the Labiatae s.l., which includes the Labiatae, subfamilies Caryopteridoideae, Chloanthoideae, and Viticoideae of the Verbenaceae, and Symphoremataceae. Representatives of subfamily Verbenoideae (Verbenaceae s. str.) do not form a monophyletic group with the Labiatae s.l. Avicennia (Avicenniaceae), Cyclocheilon (Nesogenaceae), and Euthystachys and Retzia (Stilbaceae), included in the Verbenaceae by many authors, are distinct from the Labiatae s.l. and Verbenaceae s. str. The inferred phylogeny also provides a framework to interpret character evolution. Results suggest that uniovulate locules have evolved in at least two lineages of Lamiales s.l. and that a gynoecium with four locules by the development of false partitions apparently has evolved independently in the Labiatae s.l. and the Verbenaceae s. str. Whereas a dry fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Lamiales s.l., a fleshy fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Labiatae s.l. with possible reversal in four lineages.1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ1 aOLMSTEAD, RG  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/phylogeny-labiatae-and-verbenaceae-inferred-rbcl-sequences02366nas a2200145   4500008004100000245009400041210006900135300000800204490000700212520183300219100001602052700001702068700001702085856011802102       1997                        eng d00aA comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study0 acomparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system   a3130 v463 aThe family Lamiaceae was used as a case study to compare our current system of nomenclature with a phylogenetic alternative proposed by de Queiroz and Gauthier (1992, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480), with emphasis on nomenclatural stability and efficiency. Comparison of published cladistic analyses revealed 19 suprageneric clades within Lamiaceae that are supported well enough to merit naming, but many genera could not be placed with confidence in any infrafamilial taxon. Two phylogenetic classifications were prepared, one following current nomenclatural rules and conventions and the other following the phylogenetic system of nomenclature. A comparison of the classificationsrevealed examples of unstable and ambiguous names that resulted from employing current rules and conventions to name clades. Old names based on nomenclatural types of uncertain phylogenetic relationship and infrafamilial taxon names based on the type of the family are particularly prone to instability. The phylogenetic system appears to have fewer problems but may also lead to nomenclatural confusion if taxon names are defined carelessly. The current system produces less efficient classifications because the principle of exhaustive subsidiary taxa leads to inclusion of redundant names (monotypic taxa) when the classification is based on an asymmetrical cladogram. In contrast, the phylogenetic system contains no redundant names. We endorse the recommendation that the principle of exhaustive subsidiary taxa be abandoned. Phylogenetic definitions should be provided for taxon names whenever phylogenies are translated into classifications. The definitions should be accompanied by a list of synapomorphiesand a statementof clade membership to facilitate subsequent provisional referral of newly studied species to supraspecific taxa.1 aCANTINO, PD1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/comparison-phylogenetic-nomenclature-current-system-botanical-case-study01680nas a2200301   4500008004100000245006000041210005900101260000800160300001400168490000800182520070600190653001400896653001500910653001900925653001000944653001300954653001400967653000900981653002300990653001401013653000901027100001701036700001701053700001601070700001501086700001701101856026001118       1998                        eng d00aPhylogeny in Labiatae sl, inferred from cpDNA sequences0 aPhylogeny in Labiatae sl inferred from cpDNA sequences  cJan  a265–2740 v2093 aSequences of rbcL and ndhF were analysed independently and in combination to resolve phylogenetic relationships in Labiatae s. 1. Monophyly of Labiatae s. 1 was supported by all three analyses. Congea tomentosa (Symphoremataceae) is nested within Labiatae s. 1. in the rbcL analysis, but emerges as the sister group of Labiatae s. 1. in the ndhF and combined analyses. Four noteworthy clades of Labiate s. 1. also are supported by all analyses corresponding to subfamilies Nepetoideae, Lamioideae, Pogostemonoideae and Scutellarioideae. Monophyly of subfamilies Chloanthoideae and Viticoideae is not supported. A clade comprising Teucrioideae plus Ajuga is supported by ndhF and the combined analysis.10aAsteridae10aCladistics10aClassification10aCpdna10aLabiatae10aLamiaceae10aNdhf10aParsimony Analysis10aPhylogeny10aRbcl1 aWAGSTAFF, SJ1 aHickerson, L1 aSpangler, R1 aReeves, PA1 aOLMSTEAD, RG  uhttp://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS&action=retrieve&SrcApp=Papers&UT=000072628900007&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5&SrcAuth=mekentosj&mode=FullRecord&customersID=mekentosj&DestFail=http%253A%252F%252Faccess.isiproducts.com%252Fcustom_image01781nas a2200181   4500008004100000245004300041210004300084300000800127490000700135520128400142100001701426700002001443700001401463700001401477700001601491700001501507856007701522       2001                        eng d00aDisintegration of the Scrophulariaceae0 aDisintegration of the Scrophulariaceae  a3480 v883 aA molecular systematic study of Scrophulariaceae sensu lato using DNA sequences of three plastid genes (rbcL, ndhF, and rps2) revealed at least five distinct monophyletic groups. Thirty-nine genera representing 24 tribes of the Scrophulariaceae s.l. (sensu lato) were analyzed along with representatives of 15 other families of Lamiales. The Scrophulariaceae s.s. (sensu stricto) include part or all of tribes Aptosimeae, Hemimerideae, Leucophylleae, Manuleae, Selagineae, and Verbasceae (= Scrophularieae) and the conventional families Buddlejaceae and Myoporaceae. Veronicaceae includes all or part of tribes Angelonieae, Antirrhineae, Cheloneae, Digitaleae, and Gratioleae and the conventional families Callitrichaceae, Globulariaceae, Hippuridaceae, and Plantaginaceae. The Orobanchaceae include tribes Buchnereae, Rhinantheae, and the conventional Orobanchaceae. All sampled members of Orobanchaceae are parasitic, except Lindenbergia, which is sister to the rest of the family. Family Calceolariaceae Olmstead is newly erected herein to recognize the phylogenetic distinctiveness of tribe Calceolarieae. The Calceolariaceae are close to the base of the Lamiales. The Stilbaceae are expanded by the inclusion of Halleria. Mimulus does not belong in any of these five groups.1 aOLMSTEAD, RG1 adePamphilis, CW1 aWolfe, AD1 aYoung, ND1 aElisons, WJ1 aReeves, PA  uhttps://lamiaceae.myspecies.info/content/disintegration-scrophulariaceae