@article {Steane:1999p936,
	title = {Molecular systematics of Clerodendrum (Lamiaceae): ITS sequences and total evidence},
	journal = {American Journal of Botany},
	volume = {86},
	number = {1},
	year = {1999},
	pages = {98{\textendash}107},
	author = {DA Steane and RW Scotland and DJ Mabberley and RG OLMSTEAD}
}
@article {WAGSTAFF:1995p916,
	title = {Parsimony Analysis of cpDNA Restriction Site Variation in Subfamily Nepetoideae (Labiatae)},
	journal = {Am J Bot},
	volume = {82},
	number = {7},
	year = {1995},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {886{\textendash}892},
	abstract = {Parsimony analysis of cpDNA restriction site variation supports monophyly of subfamily Nepetoideae, However, a close relationship among Nepetoideae and other gynobasic-styled Labiatae is not supported, indicating that a gynobasic style has evolved independently in at least two clades of Labiatae. The inferred relationships are congruent with the classification of Cantino, Harley, and Wagstaff (1992, Advances in labiate sciences, 27-37, Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew) but conflict to varying degrees with traditional classifications. Monophyly of four tribes of Nepetoideae also is supported.},
	keywords = {Classification, Dna, Evolution, Lamiaceae, Phylogeny},
	author = {SJ WAGSTAFF and RG OLMSTEAD and PD CANTINO}
}
@article {Yuan:2008p172,
	title = {A species-level phylogenetic study of the Verbena complex (Verbenaceae) indicates two independent intergeneric chloroplast transfers},
	journal = {Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution},
	volume = {48},
	number = {1},
	year = {2008},
	pages = {23{\textendash}33},
	author = {YW Yuan and RG OLMSTEAD}
}
@article {Trusty:2005p492,
	title = {Molecular phylogenetics of the Macaronesian-endemic genus Bystropogon(Lamiaceae): palaeo-islands, ecological shifts and interisland colonizations},
	journal = {Molecular Ecology},
	volume = {14},
	number = {4},
	year = {2005},
	pages = {1177{\textendash}1189},
	author = {JL Trusty and RG OLMSTEAD and A Santos-Guerra and S Sa-Fontinha and J Francisco-Ortega}
}
@article {Trusty:2004p1119,
	title = {Using molecular data to test a biogeographic connection of the Macaronesian genus Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) to the New World: A case of conflicting phylogenies},
	journal = {Systematic Botany},
	volume = {29},
	number = {3},
	year = {2004},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {702{\textendash}715},
	abstract = {Bystropogon (Lamiaceae) is endemic to the Macaronesian Islands and represents the best-known example of a putative phytogeographic connection between these islands and the New World. Previous morphological taxonomic studies suggested that this genus is closely related to the western South American Minthostachys. Phylogenetic analyses of nucleotide sequences of the internal transcribed spacers and 5.8S subunit of nuclear ribosomal DNA and the trnL gene and trnL-trnF spacer of the chloroplast genome for 33 of the 72 genera in the Mentheae tribe were performed. Maximum parsimony analysis of the combined data set resulted in 63 most parsimonious trees. The strict consensus tree of this analysis shows with moderate bootstrap support (74\%) that Bystropogon is sister to the Old World taxa Acinos, Ziziphora, and Clinopodium vulgare. When analyzed separately, the ITS and trnL/F data sets do not agree as to the sister group to Bystropogon, although none supports a sister relationship with Minthostachys. The cpDNA phylogeny strongly supports a relationship of Bystropogon with a clade of New World mint taxa (90\% bootstrap value). Due to the apparent conflict between the chloroplast and nuclear characters observed in the phylogenies, we are not certain of the true biogeographic relationship of Bystropogon. Finally, in all analyses, all of the Mentheae genera sampled in this study form a monophyletic group (100\% bootstrap value) and a derived clade of ten New World genera is found. These results contribute to our understanding of generic relationships within the tribe.},
	keywords = {Canary-Islands, Chloroplast Dna, Ilex L. Aquifoliaceae, Internal Transcribed Spacer, Nuclear Ribosomal Dna, Parsimony Analysis, Pollen Wall Ultrastructure, Restriction-Site Variation, Sequence Data, Subgenus Pinus},
	url = {http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS\&action=retrieve\&SrcApp=Papers\&UT=000223702400014\&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5\&SrcAuth=mekentosj\&mode=FullRecord\&customersID=mekentosj\&DestFail=http\%253A\%252F\%252Faccess.isiproducts.com\%252Fcustom_image},
	author = {JL Trusty and RG OLMSTEAD and DJ Bogler and A Santos-Guerra and J Francisco-Ortega}
}
@article {WAGSTAFF:1997p633,
	title = {Phylogeny of Labiatae and Verbenaceae Inferred from rbcL Sequences},
	journal = {Systematic Botany},
	volume = {22},
	number = {1},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {165{\textendash}179},
	abstract = {Parsimony analysis of rbcL sequences supports monophyly of the Labiatae s.l., which includes the Labiatae, subfamilies Caryopteridoideae, Chloanthoideae, and Viticoideae of the Verbenaceae, and Symphoremataceae. Representatives of subfamily Verbenoideae (Verbenaceae s. str.) do not form a monophyletic group with the Labiatae s.l. Avicennia (Avicenniaceae), Cyclocheilon (Nesogenaceae), and Euthystachys and Retzia (Stilbaceae), included in the Verbenaceae by many authors, are distinct from the Labiatae s.l. and Verbenaceae s. str. The inferred phylogeny also provides a framework to interpret character evolution. Results suggest that uniovulate locules have evolved in at least two lineages of Lamiales s.l. and that a gynoecium with four locules by the development of false partitions apparently has evolved independently in the Labiatae s.l. and the Verbenaceae s. str. Whereas a dry fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Lamiales s.l., a fleshy fruit is pleisiomorphic in the Labiatae s.l. with possible reversal in four lineages.},
	author = {SJ WAGSTAFF and RG OLMSTEAD}
}
@article {CANTINO:1997p453,
	title = {A comparison of phylogenetic nomenclature with the current system: a botanical case study},
	journal = {Systematic Biology},
	volume = {46},
	number = {2},
	year = {1997},
	pages = {313},
	abstract = {The family Lamiaceae was used as a case study to compare our current system of nomenclature with a phylogenetic alternative proposed by de Queiroz and Gauthier (1992, Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 23:449-480), with emphasis on nomenclatural stability and efficiency. Comparison of published cladistic analyses revealed 19 suprageneric clades within Lamiaceae that are supported well enough to merit naming, but many genera could not be placed with confidence in any infrafamilial taxon. Two phylogenetic classifications were prepared, one following current nomenclatural rules and conventions and the other following the phylogenetic system of nomenclature. A comparison of the classificationsrevealed examples of unstable and ambiguous names that resulted from employing current rules and conventions to name clades. Old names based on nomenclatural types of uncertain phylogenetic relationship and infrafamilial taxon names based on the type of the family are particularly prone to instability. The phylogenetic system appears to have fewer problems but may also lead to nomenclatural confusion if taxon names are defined carelessly. The current system produces less efficient classifications because the principle of exhaustive subsidiary taxa leads to inclusion of redundant names (monotypic taxa) when the classification is based on an asymmetrical cladogram. In contrast, the phylogenetic system contains no redundant names. We endorse the recommendation that the principle of exhaustive subsidiary taxa be abandoned. Phylogenetic definitions should be provided for taxon names whenever phylogenies are translated into classifications. The definitions should be accompanied by a list of synapomorphiesand a statementof clade membership to facilitate subsequent provisional referral of newly studied species to supraspecific taxa.},
	author = {PD CANTINO and RG OLMSTEAD and SJ WAGSTAFF}
}
@article {WAGSTAFF:1998p1141,
	title = {Phylogeny in Labiatae sl, inferred from cpDNA sequences},
	journal = {Plant Systematics and Evolution},
	volume = {209},
	number = {3-4},
	year = {1998},
	month = {Jan},
	pages = {265{\textendash}274},
	abstract = {Sequences of rbcL and ndhF were analysed independently and in combination to resolve phylogenetic relationships in Labiatae s. 1. Monophyly of Labiatae s. 1 was supported by all three analyses. Congea tomentosa (Symphoremataceae) is nested within Labiatae s. 1. in the rbcL analysis, but emerges as the sister group of Labiatae s. 1. in the ndhF and combined analyses. Four noteworthy clades of Labiate s. 1. also are supported by all analyses corresponding to subfamilies Nepetoideae, Lamioideae, Pogostemonoideae and Scutellarioideae. Monophyly of subfamilies Chloanthoideae and Viticoideae is not supported. A clade comprising Teucrioideae plus Ajuga is supported by ndhF and the combined analysis.},
	keywords = {Asteridae, Cladistics, Classification, Cpdna, Labiatae, Lamiaceae, Ndhf, Parsimony Analysis, Phylogeny, Rbcl},
	url = {http://apps.isiknowledge.com/InboundService.do?product=WOS\&action=retrieve\&SrcApp=Papers\&UT=000072628900007\&SID=2AFL5dnj5MCc8JPedL5\&SrcAuth=mekentosj\&mode=FullRecord\&customersID=mekentosj\&DestFail=http\%253A\%252F\%252Faccess.isiproducts.com\%252Fcustom_image},
	author = {SJ WAGSTAFF and L Hickerson and R Spangler and PA Reeves and RG OLMSTEAD}
}
@article {OLMSTEAD:2001p1448,
	title = {Disintegration of the Scrophulariaceae},
	journal = {Am J Bot},
	volume = {88},
	number = {2},
	year = {2001},
	pages = {348},
	abstract = {A molecular systematic study of Scrophulariaceae sensu lato using DNA sequences of three plastid genes (rbcL, ndhF, and rps2) revealed at least five distinct monophyletic groups. Thirty-nine genera representing 24 tribes of the Scrophulariaceae s.l. (sensu lato) were analyzed along with representatives of 15 other families of Lamiales. The Scrophulariaceae s.s. (sensu stricto) include part or all of tribes Aptosimeae, Hemimerideae, Leucophylleae, Manuleae, Selagineae, and Verbasceae (= Scrophularieae) and the conventional families Buddlejaceae and Myoporaceae. Veronicaceae includes all or part of tribes Angelonieae, Antirrhineae, Cheloneae, Digitaleae, and Gratioleae and the conventional families Callitrichaceae, Globulariaceae, Hippuridaceae, and Plantaginaceae. The Orobanchaceae include tribes Buchnereae, Rhinantheae, and the conventional Orobanchaceae. All sampled members of Orobanchaceae are parasitic, except Lindenbergia, which is sister to the rest of the family. Family Calceolariaceae Olmstead is newly erected herein to recognize the phylogenetic distinctiveness of tribe Calceolarieae. The Calceolariaceae are close to the base of the Lamiales. The Stilbaceae are expanded by the inclusion of Halleria. Mimulus does not belong in any of these five groups.},
	author = {RG OLMSTEAD and CW dePamphilis and AD Wolfe and ND Young and WJ Elisons and PA Reeves}
}
